Stark Review and verdict 2026

Accessibility checking (contrast, colour blindness) directly in Figma.

From 6.06€/mo.

Our take

Understanding Stark.

Stark is accessibility checking (contrast, colour blindness) directly in Figma. Starting at €6.06/month. Built for UX/UI designers and graphic designers.

Estimated time saving: 2h/month.

Practical uses

Quickly check contrast ratios during design.
Simulate perception for colorblind users.
Generate WCAG reports before development.
Train teams on accessibility standards.

Pros and cons

What Stark does especially well — and the limits to anticipate.

Pros

Robust free plan to check contrast ratios.
Color blindness simulator very useful.
Automated WCAG reports (Pro).
Complete a11y checklist.
Direct Figma integration.

Cons

Advanced features (focus, alt text) are paid.
Pro pricing can be steep for solo designers.
Not a substitute for real user testing.

Stark: when it makes sense.

Stark wins for embedding accessibility into Figma design. For full post-launch audits, pair with user testing.

Keep if

You design interfaces and must meet WCAG standards.. You work in Figma.

Stark becomes worthwhile when

You use it at least once a week
The monthly cost (€6) is small next to the time it saves you

Challenge if

You have no legal accessibility requirements.. You're looking for a full accessibility audit post-project.

Stark becomes too expensive when

You use it less than once a month
A simple free version or a tool already in your stack would do

Our verdict on Stark.

Why this verdict

Decent

Stark is hard to replace short-term, a free tier to test before paying, clearly documented use cases.