Stark reviews

Figma plugin for accessibility and color contrast testing. Verifies WCAG contrast ratios, simulates color blindness, manages focus order, and checks touch targets.

Visit website

About

In practice. What you can do with Stark.

Figma plugin for accessibility and color contrast testing. Verifies WCAG contrast ratios, simulates color blindness, manages focus order, and checks touch targets.

Key strengths: Robust free plan to check contrast ratios.; Color blindness simulator very useful.; Automated WCAG reports (Pro).; Complete a11y checklist.; Direct Figma integration..

Stark wins for embedding accessibility into Figma design. For full post-launch audits, pair with user testing.

Practical uses

Quickly check contrast ratios during design.
Simulate perception for colorblind users.
Generate WCAG reports before development.
Train teams on accessibility standards.

Features & use cases

Accessibilite

Design visuel

UI design

Design system

Pros and cons. What Stark does well, and what to expect.

Pros

Robust free plan to check contrast ratios.
Color blindness simulator very useful.
Automated WCAG reports (Pro).
Complete a11y checklist.
Direct Figma integration.

Cons

Advanced features (focus, alt text) are paid.
Pro pricing can be steep for solo designers.
Not a substitute for real user testing.

When it makes sense. Keep Stark, or challenge it?

Keep if

You design interfaces and must meet WCAG standards.
You work in Figma.

Stark becomes worthwhile when

You use it at least once a week
The monthly cost ($6.06) is small next to the time it saves you

Challenge if

You have no legal accessibility requirements.
You're looking for a full accessibility audit post-project.

Stark becomes too expensive when

You use it less than once a month
A simple free version or a tool already in your stack would do

Our verdict. What to know about Stark.

Why this verdict

Great

Stark is hard to replace short-term, a free tier to test before paying, clearly documented use cases.

StarkFrom €6.06/mo

Visit